Equipercentile equating of scores from common patient-reported outcome measures of physical function in patients with cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Equipercentile equating of scores from common patient-reported outcome measures of physical function in patients with cancer. / Rothmund, Maria; Pilz, Micha J; Schlosser, Lisa; Arraras, Juan I; Groenvold, Mogens; Holzner, Bernhard; van Leeuwen, Marieke; Petersen, Morten Aa; Schmidt, Heike; Young, Teresa; Rose, Matthias; Cella, David; Giesinger, Johannes M; EORTC Quality of Life Group.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 165, 111203, 2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Rothmund, M, Pilz, MJ, Schlosser, L, Arraras, JI, Groenvold, M, Holzner, B, van Leeuwen, M, Petersen, MA, Schmidt, H, Young, T, Rose, M, Cella, D, Giesinger, JM & EORTC Quality of Life Group 2024, 'Equipercentile equating of scores from common patient-reported outcome measures of physical function in patients with cancer', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 165, 111203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.019

APA

Rothmund, M., Pilz, M. J., Schlosser, L., Arraras, J. I., Groenvold, M., Holzner, B., van Leeuwen, M., Petersen, M. A., Schmidt, H., Young, T., Rose, M., Cella, D., Giesinger, J. M., & EORTC Quality of Life Group (2024). Equipercentile equating of scores from common patient-reported outcome measures of physical function in patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 165, [111203]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.019

Vancouver

Rothmund M, Pilz MJ, Schlosser L, Arraras JI, Groenvold M, Holzner B et al. Equipercentile equating of scores from common patient-reported outcome measures of physical function in patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2024;165. 111203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.019

Author

Rothmund, Maria ; Pilz, Micha J ; Schlosser, Lisa ; Arraras, Juan I ; Groenvold, Mogens ; Holzner, Bernhard ; van Leeuwen, Marieke ; Petersen, Morten Aa ; Schmidt, Heike ; Young, Teresa ; Rose, Matthias ; Cella, David ; Giesinger, Johannes M ; EORTC Quality of Life Group. / Equipercentile equating of scores from common patient-reported outcome measures of physical function in patients with cancer. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2024 ; Vol. 165.

Bibtex

@article{b927aea1437f4f989b9142dd41217127,
title = "Equipercentile equating of scores from common patient-reported outcome measures of physical function in patients with cancer",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To provide equipercentile equating of physical function (PF) scores from frequently used PROMs in cancer patients to facilitate data pooling and comparisons.STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Adult cancer patients from five European countries completed the EORTC CAT Core, EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-G, SF-36, and the PROMIS Physical Function 20a short form. The R package {"}equate{"} was used to establish conversion tables of PF scores on those measures with a bivariate rank correlation of at least 0.75.RESULTS: In total, 953 patients with cancer (mean age 58.9 years, 54.7% men) participated. Bivariate rank correlations between PF scores from the EORTC CAT Core, EORTC QLQ-C30, SF-36, and PROMIS were all above 0.85, but below 0.69 for the FACT-G. Conversion tables were established for all measures but the FACT-G. These tables indicate which score from one PROM best matches the score from another PROM and provide standard errors of converted scores.CONCLUSION: Our analysis indicates that linking of PF scores from both EORTC measures (CAT and QLQ-C30) with PROMIS and SF-36 is possible whereas the physical domain of the FACT-G seems to be different. The established conversion tables may be used for comparing results or pooling data from clinical studies using different PROMs.",
author = "Maria Rothmund and Pilz, {Micha J} and Lisa Schlosser and Arraras, {Juan I} and Mogens Groenvold and Bernhard Holzner and {van Leeuwen}, Marieke and Petersen, {Morten Aa} and Heike Schmidt and Teresa Young and Matthias Rose and David Cella and Giesinger, {Johannes M} and {EORTC Quality of Life Group}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.019",
language = "English",
volume = "165",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Equipercentile equating of scores from common patient-reported outcome measures of physical function in patients with cancer

AU - Rothmund, Maria

AU - Pilz, Micha J

AU - Schlosser, Lisa

AU - Arraras, Juan I

AU - Groenvold, Mogens

AU - Holzner, Bernhard

AU - van Leeuwen, Marieke

AU - Petersen, Morten Aa

AU - Schmidt, Heike

AU - Young, Teresa

AU - Rose, Matthias

AU - Cella, David

AU - Giesinger, Johannes M

AU - EORTC Quality of Life Group

N1 - Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To provide equipercentile equating of physical function (PF) scores from frequently used PROMs in cancer patients to facilitate data pooling and comparisons.STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Adult cancer patients from five European countries completed the EORTC CAT Core, EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-G, SF-36, and the PROMIS Physical Function 20a short form. The R package "equate" was used to establish conversion tables of PF scores on those measures with a bivariate rank correlation of at least 0.75.RESULTS: In total, 953 patients with cancer (mean age 58.9 years, 54.7% men) participated. Bivariate rank correlations between PF scores from the EORTC CAT Core, EORTC QLQ-C30, SF-36, and PROMIS were all above 0.85, but below 0.69 for the FACT-G. Conversion tables were established for all measures but the FACT-G. These tables indicate which score from one PROM best matches the score from another PROM and provide standard errors of converted scores.CONCLUSION: Our analysis indicates that linking of PF scores from both EORTC measures (CAT and QLQ-C30) with PROMIS and SF-36 is possible whereas the physical domain of the FACT-G seems to be different. The established conversion tables may be used for comparing results or pooling data from clinical studies using different PROMs.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To provide equipercentile equating of physical function (PF) scores from frequently used PROMs in cancer patients to facilitate data pooling and comparisons.STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Adult cancer patients from five European countries completed the EORTC CAT Core, EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-G, SF-36, and the PROMIS Physical Function 20a short form. The R package "equate" was used to establish conversion tables of PF scores on those measures with a bivariate rank correlation of at least 0.75.RESULTS: In total, 953 patients with cancer (mean age 58.9 years, 54.7% men) participated. Bivariate rank correlations between PF scores from the EORTC CAT Core, EORTC QLQ-C30, SF-36, and PROMIS were all above 0.85, but below 0.69 for the FACT-G. Conversion tables were established for all measures but the FACT-G. These tables indicate which score from one PROM best matches the score from another PROM and provide standard errors of converted scores.CONCLUSION: Our analysis indicates that linking of PF scores from both EORTC measures (CAT and QLQ-C30) with PROMIS and SF-36 is possible whereas the physical domain of the FACT-G seems to be different. The established conversion tables may be used for comparing results or pooling data from clinical studies using different PROMs.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.019

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.019

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37918641

VL - 165

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

M1 - 111203

ER -

ID: 374128044