Ethical and Human Rights Concerns of Sexual Orientation Change Efforts

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Ethical and Human Rights Concerns of Sexual Orientation Change Efforts. / Strizzi, Jenna Marie; Di Nucci, Ezio.

In: Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 52, 2023, p. 865–867.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Strizzi, JM & Di Nucci, E 2023, 'Ethical and Human Rights Concerns of Sexual Orientation Change Efforts', Archives of Sexual Behavior, vol. 52, pp. 865–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02446-w

APA

Strizzi, J. M., & Di Nucci, E. (2023). Ethical and Human Rights Concerns of Sexual Orientation Change Efforts. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52, 865–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02446-w

Vancouver

Strizzi JM, Di Nucci E. Ethical and Human Rights Concerns of Sexual Orientation Change Efforts. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2023;52:865–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02446-w

Author

Strizzi, Jenna Marie ; Di Nucci, Ezio. / Ethical and Human Rights Concerns of Sexual Orientation Change Efforts. In: Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2023 ; Vol. 52. pp. 865–867.

Bibtex

@article{f899e70dcfd047169b08a37a4636538e,
title = "Ethical and Human Rights Concerns of Sexual Orientation Change Efforts",
abstract = "In this brief commentary, we present several reasons why the publication of “Sexual Orientation Change Efforts Do Not Increase Suicide: Correcting a False Research Narrative” by Sullins (2022) in the Archives of Sexual Behavior is egregiously problematic. As we understand that Blosnich et al. (2020) are currently preparing a commentary addressing the methodological concerns of Sullins (2022), we will focus on the ethical and human rights issues associated with Sullins{\textquoteright} paper, which argues that sexual orientation change efforts (SOCE) do not result in higher suicidality. Our main argument here is that the obvious and very serious ethical and human rights concerns related to SOCE transcend any methodological analysis by Sullins (2022) or indeed anyone else, for the simple reason that the problem with SOCE is not just about outcomes and well-being but primarily about rights and autonomy so that a methodological analysis seeking to undermine causation is just irrelevant.",
author = "Strizzi, {Jenna Marie} and {Di Nucci}, Ezio",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1007/s10508-022-02446-w",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "865–867",
journal = "Archives of Sexual Behavior",
issn = "0004-0002",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical and Human Rights Concerns of Sexual Orientation Change Efforts

AU - Strizzi, Jenna Marie

AU - Di Nucci, Ezio

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - In this brief commentary, we present several reasons why the publication of “Sexual Orientation Change Efforts Do Not Increase Suicide: Correcting a False Research Narrative” by Sullins (2022) in the Archives of Sexual Behavior is egregiously problematic. As we understand that Blosnich et al. (2020) are currently preparing a commentary addressing the methodological concerns of Sullins (2022), we will focus on the ethical and human rights issues associated with Sullins’ paper, which argues that sexual orientation change efforts (SOCE) do not result in higher suicidality. Our main argument here is that the obvious and very serious ethical and human rights concerns related to SOCE transcend any methodological analysis by Sullins (2022) or indeed anyone else, for the simple reason that the problem with SOCE is not just about outcomes and well-being but primarily about rights and autonomy so that a methodological analysis seeking to undermine causation is just irrelevant.

AB - In this brief commentary, we present several reasons why the publication of “Sexual Orientation Change Efforts Do Not Increase Suicide: Correcting a False Research Narrative” by Sullins (2022) in the Archives of Sexual Behavior is egregiously problematic. As we understand that Blosnich et al. (2020) are currently preparing a commentary addressing the methodological concerns of Sullins (2022), we will focus on the ethical and human rights issues associated with Sullins’ paper, which argues that sexual orientation change efforts (SOCE) do not result in higher suicidality. Our main argument here is that the obvious and very serious ethical and human rights concerns related to SOCE transcend any methodological analysis by Sullins (2022) or indeed anyone else, for the simple reason that the problem with SOCE is not just about outcomes and well-being but primarily about rights and autonomy so that a methodological analysis seeking to undermine causation is just irrelevant.

U2 - 10.1007/s10508-022-02446-w

DO - 10.1007/s10508-022-02446-w

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36287304

VL - 52

SP - 865

EP - 867

JO - Archives of Sexual Behavior

JF - Archives of Sexual Behavior

SN - 0004-0002

ER -

ID: 323541378