Heart Team therapeutic decision-making and treatment in severe aortic valve stenosis
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Objectives: After transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been available for high-risk patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AVS), the decision-making of the Heart Team (HT) has not been examined.
Design: All adult patients with severe AVS referred to a large tertiary medical centre in 2011 were prospectively included. Multivariate regression analysis identified independent factors associated with treatment decisions.
Results: A total of 487 patients were included (mean age: 75 years, NYHA class III-IV: 47%). The HT proposed medical therapy (MT) in 35 (7%), TAVI in 60 (12%), and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in 392 (81%) of patients. In patients referred to intervention, TAVI compared with SAVR patients were older (OR = 1.17 per year, 95% CI 1.09-1.26; p < 0.01) with more previous coronary artery bypass surgery (OR = 385, 79-2738; p < 0.01), obesity (OR = 4.69, 1.51-13.77; p < 0.01), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR = 3.66, 1.21-10.75; p = 0.02). MT patients compared with patients referred to any intervention were older, had a higher prevalence of COPD, peripheral arterial disease, previous myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular disease.
Conclusions: The HT proposed intervention in 93% of patients with severe AVS despite high age, advanced symptoms and a high burden of co-morbidity. TAVI was reserved for older patients particularly with previous CABG.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 3 |
Pages (from-to) | 146–153 |
Number of pages | 8 |
ISSN | 1401-7431 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
ID: 157490696