Independent effect of physical workload and childhood socioeconomic status on low back pain among health care workers in Denmark

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Independent effect of physical workload and childhood socioeconomic status on low back pain among health care workers in Denmark. / Jørgensen, Marie Birk; Nabe-Nielsen, Kirsten; Clausen, Thomas; Holtermann, Andreas.

In: Spine, Vol. 38, No. 6, 15.03.2013, p. E359-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Jørgensen, MB, Nabe-Nielsen, K, Clausen, T & Holtermann, A 2013, 'Independent effect of physical workload and childhood socioeconomic status on low back pain among health care workers in Denmark', Spine, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. E359-66. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828435d4

APA

Jørgensen, M. B., Nabe-Nielsen, K., Clausen, T., & Holtermann, A. (2013). Independent effect of physical workload and childhood socioeconomic status on low back pain among health care workers in Denmark. Spine, 38(6), E359-66. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828435d4

Vancouver

Jørgensen MB, Nabe-Nielsen K, Clausen T, Holtermann A. Independent effect of physical workload and childhood socioeconomic status on low back pain among health care workers in Denmark. Spine. 2013 Mar 15;38(6):E359-66. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828435d4

Author

Jørgensen, Marie Birk ; Nabe-Nielsen, Kirsten ; Clausen, Thomas ; Holtermann, Andreas. / Independent effect of physical workload and childhood socioeconomic status on low back pain among health care workers in Denmark. In: Spine. 2013 ; Vol. 38, No. 6. pp. E359-66.

Bibtex

@article{0a576bbc0af44ce7a03ad8ba8f82f1f5,
title = "Independent effect of physical workload and childhood socioeconomic status on low back pain among health care workers in Denmark",
abstract = "STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.OBJECTIVE: To investigate the independent effect of physical workload and childhood socioeconomic status (CSES) on low back pain (LBP) and LBP-related sickness absence among female health care workers.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The role of physical workload on LBP independently from CSES is still subject to controversy.METHODS: We used questionnaire data from 1661 female social and health care workers responding to a questionnaire in 2004, 2005, and 2006. We collected information on CSES (parental occupation), physical workload, and LBP-prevalence (no LBP, subchronic LBP, and frequent LBP), and LBP-related sickness absence. The participants were categorized into 5 groups according to CSES (I = highest, V = lowest). Data were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.RESULTS: Irrespective of CSES, high physical workload increased the odds ratio (OR) of future subchronic LBP (OR = 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-2.57) and frequent LBP (OR = 2.20; 95% CI, 1.65-3.00), but not LBP-related sickness absence. The odds of subchronic LBP were lower in CSES groups II (OR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.93) and III (OR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.86) referencing CSES group I, irrespective of physical workload. The odds of short-term LBP-related sickness absence were higher in CSES groups III (OR = 2.78; 95% CI, 1.41-5.47) and IV (OR = 2.18; 95% CI, 1.11-4.27) referencing CSES group I, irrespective of physical workload. We found no interaction between physical workload and CSES.CONCLUSION: Physical workload and CSES are independently associated with future LBP within a group with similar occupational status.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.",
keywords = "Adult, Child, Denmark, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Logistic Models, Low Back Pain, Middle Aged, Occupational Diseases, Prospective Studies, Questionnaires, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Sick Leave, Social Class, Workload, Young Adult",
author = "J{\o}rgensen, {Marie Birk} and Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen and Thomas Clausen and Andreas Holtermann",
year = "2013",
month = mar,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828435d4",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "E359--66",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Independent effect of physical workload and childhood socioeconomic status on low back pain among health care workers in Denmark

AU - Jørgensen, Marie Birk

AU - Nabe-Nielsen, Kirsten

AU - Clausen, Thomas

AU - Holtermann, Andreas

PY - 2013/3/15

Y1 - 2013/3/15

N2 - STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.OBJECTIVE: To investigate the independent effect of physical workload and childhood socioeconomic status (CSES) on low back pain (LBP) and LBP-related sickness absence among female health care workers.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The role of physical workload on LBP independently from CSES is still subject to controversy.METHODS: We used questionnaire data from 1661 female social and health care workers responding to a questionnaire in 2004, 2005, and 2006. We collected information on CSES (parental occupation), physical workload, and LBP-prevalence (no LBP, subchronic LBP, and frequent LBP), and LBP-related sickness absence. The participants were categorized into 5 groups according to CSES (I = highest, V = lowest). Data were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.RESULTS: Irrespective of CSES, high physical workload increased the odds ratio (OR) of future subchronic LBP (OR = 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-2.57) and frequent LBP (OR = 2.20; 95% CI, 1.65-3.00), but not LBP-related sickness absence. The odds of subchronic LBP were lower in CSES groups II (OR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.93) and III (OR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.86) referencing CSES group I, irrespective of physical workload. The odds of short-term LBP-related sickness absence were higher in CSES groups III (OR = 2.78; 95% CI, 1.41-5.47) and IV (OR = 2.18; 95% CI, 1.11-4.27) referencing CSES group I, irrespective of physical workload. We found no interaction between physical workload and CSES.CONCLUSION: Physical workload and CSES are independently associated with future LBP within a group with similar occupational status.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

AB - STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.OBJECTIVE: To investigate the independent effect of physical workload and childhood socioeconomic status (CSES) on low back pain (LBP) and LBP-related sickness absence among female health care workers.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The role of physical workload on LBP independently from CSES is still subject to controversy.METHODS: We used questionnaire data from 1661 female social and health care workers responding to a questionnaire in 2004, 2005, and 2006. We collected information on CSES (parental occupation), physical workload, and LBP-prevalence (no LBP, subchronic LBP, and frequent LBP), and LBP-related sickness absence. The participants were categorized into 5 groups according to CSES (I = highest, V = lowest). Data were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.RESULTS: Irrespective of CSES, high physical workload increased the odds ratio (OR) of future subchronic LBP (OR = 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-2.57) and frequent LBP (OR = 2.20; 95% CI, 1.65-3.00), but not LBP-related sickness absence. The odds of subchronic LBP were lower in CSES groups II (OR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.93) and III (OR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.86) referencing CSES group I, irrespective of physical workload. The odds of short-term LBP-related sickness absence were higher in CSES groups III (OR = 2.78; 95% CI, 1.41-5.47) and IV (OR = 2.18; 95% CI, 1.11-4.27) referencing CSES group I, irrespective of physical workload. We found no interaction between physical workload and CSES.CONCLUSION: Physical workload and CSES are independently associated with future LBP within a group with similar occupational status.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

KW - Adult

KW - Child

KW - Denmark

KW - Female

KW - Health Personnel

KW - Humans

KW - Logistic Models

KW - Low Back Pain

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Occupational Diseases

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Risk Assessment

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Sick Leave

KW - Social Class

KW - Workload

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828435d4

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828435d4

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 23492977

VL - 38

SP - E359-66

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 120903023