Is it wrong to prioritise patients who have the highest chance of survival during Covid-19?
Research output: Other contribution › Net publication - Internet publication › Research › peer-review
Standard
Is it wrong to prioritise patients who have the highest chance of survival during Covid-19? / Daoud, Alaa; Di Nucci, Ezio.
BMJ Publishing Group. 2020.Research output: Other contribution › Net publication - Internet publication › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - ICOMM
T1 - Is it wrong to prioritise patients who have the highest chance of survival during Covid-19?
AU - Daoud, Alaa
AU - Di Nucci, Ezio
N1 - Journal of Medical Ethics Blog, 08.06.2020
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Wilkinson proposed that health systems should aim to prioritise patients who have the highest chance of survival, based on Taurek’s ‘lifeboat’ experiment, where the general public chose to save five patients instead of one patient. This is no more or less true of saying that the current approaches are all in line with a utilitarian approach of maximising benefits. However, some Jewish and Islamic scholars advocated a non-utilitarian approach in saying that once treatment has begun it is not permissible to reallocate the treatment. In such matters bioethical principles must be considered to better provide equity for patients. However, when bioethical principles come into conflict in priority setting, it indicates the lack of guidelines to strike a positive balance between benefits and harms in decision-making...
AB - Wilkinson proposed that health systems should aim to prioritise patients who have the highest chance of survival, based on Taurek’s ‘lifeboat’ experiment, where the general public chose to save five patients instead of one patient. This is no more or less true of saying that the current approaches are all in line with a utilitarian approach of maximising benefits. However, some Jewish and Islamic scholars advocated a non-utilitarian approach in saying that once treatment has begun it is not permissible to reallocate the treatment. In such matters bioethical principles must be considered to better provide equity for patients. However, when bioethical principles come into conflict in priority setting, it indicates the lack of guidelines to strike a positive balance between benefits and harms in decision-making...
M3 - Net publication - Internet publication
PB - BMJ Publishing Group
ER -
ID: 242611896