Optimising screening for cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder: Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Optimising screening for cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder: Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools. / Jensen, Johan Høy; Støttrup, Mette Marie; Nayberg, Emilie; Knorr, Ulla; Ullum, Henrik; Purdon, Scot E.; Kessing, Lars V.; Miskowiak, Kamilla W.

In: Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 187, 2015, p. 10-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Jensen, JH, Støttrup, MM, Nayberg, E, Knorr, U, Ullum, H, Purdon, SE, Kessing, LV & Miskowiak, KW 2015, 'Optimising screening for cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder: Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools', Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 187, pp. 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.039

APA

Jensen, J. H., Støttrup, M. M., Nayberg, E., Knorr, U., Ullum, H., Purdon, S. E., ... Miskowiak, K. W. (2015). Optimising screening for cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder: Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools. Journal of Affective Disorders, 187, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.039

Vancouver

Jensen JH, Støttrup MM, Nayberg E, Knorr U, Ullum H, Purdon SE et al. Optimising screening for cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder: Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2015;187:10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.039

Author

Jensen, Johan Høy ; Støttrup, Mette Marie ; Nayberg, Emilie ; Knorr, Ulla ; Ullum, Henrik ; Purdon, Scot E. ; Kessing, Lars V. ; Miskowiak, Kamilla W. / Optimising screening for cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder: Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools. In: Journal of Affective Disorders. 2015 ; Vol. 187. pp. 10-19.

Bibtex

@article{892cbe266398406cb6a884f924385778,
title = "Optimising screening for cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder: Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools",
abstract = "Introduction Cognitive impairment is common in bipolar disorder and contributes to socio-occupational difficulties. The objective was to validate and evaluate instruments to screen for and monitor cognitive impairments, and improve the understanding of the association between cognitive measures and socio-occupational capacity. Methods Patients with bipolar disorder in partial or full remission (n=84) and healthy controls (n=68) were assessed with the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP), Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Scale (COBRA), and established neuropsychological tests and subjective rating scales. Socio-occupational function and affective symptoms were evaluated with the Functional Assessment Short Test, and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-items and Young Mania Rating Scale, respectively. Concurrent validity of the SCIP and COBRA were assessed by correlation with established objective and subjective cognitive measures, and decision validity was determined with Receiver-Operating-Characteristic analyses. Correlations and linear regression analyses were conducted to determine the associations between objective and subjective cognitive impairment, and socio-occupational difficulties. Results The SCIP and COBRA correlated strongly with established objective and subjective cognitive measures, respectively. The SCIP yielded higher sensitivity and specificity for detection of cognitive dysfunction than the COBRA or a combined SCIP-COBRA measure. Correlations between objective and subjective cognitive impairment were weak but both were associated with socio-occupational difficulties. Limitations Influence of ageing was not investigated. Conclusions The SCIP and COBRA are valid for detection of objective and subjective cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder. Screening for cognitive dysfunction should be conducted with an objective measure like the SCIP.",
keywords = "Bipolar disorder, Cognitive complaints, Cognitive impairment, Screening",
author = "Jensen, {Johan H{\o}y} and St{\o}ttrup, {Mette Marie} and Emilie Nayberg and Ulla Knorr and Henrik Ullum and Purdon, {Scot E.} and Kessing, {Lars V.} and Miskowiak, {Kamilla W.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.039",
language = "English",
volume = "187",
pages = "10--19",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimising screening for cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder: Validation and evaluation of objective and subjective tools

AU - Jensen, Johan Høy

AU - Støttrup, Mette Marie

AU - Nayberg, Emilie

AU - Knorr, Ulla

AU - Ullum, Henrik

AU - Purdon, Scot E.

AU - Kessing, Lars V.

AU - Miskowiak, Kamilla W.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Introduction Cognitive impairment is common in bipolar disorder and contributes to socio-occupational difficulties. The objective was to validate and evaluate instruments to screen for and monitor cognitive impairments, and improve the understanding of the association between cognitive measures and socio-occupational capacity. Methods Patients with bipolar disorder in partial or full remission (n=84) and healthy controls (n=68) were assessed with the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP), Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Scale (COBRA), and established neuropsychological tests and subjective rating scales. Socio-occupational function and affective symptoms were evaluated with the Functional Assessment Short Test, and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-items and Young Mania Rating Scale, respectively. Concurrent validity of the SCIP and COBRA were assessed by correlation with established objective and subjective cognitive measures, and decision validity was determined with Receiver-Operating-Characteristic analyses. Correlations and linear regression analyses were conducted to determine the associations between objective and subjective cognitive impairment, and socio-occupational difficulties. Results The SCIP and COBRA correlated strongly with established objective and subjective cognitive measures, respectively. The SCIP yielded higher sensitivity and specificity for detection of cognitive dysfunction than the COBRA or a combined SCIP-COBRA measure. Correlations between objective and subjective cognitive impairment were weak but both were associated with socio-occupational difficulties. Limitations Influence of ageing was not investigated. Conclusions The SCIP and COBRA are valid for detection of objective and subjective cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder. Screening for cognitive dysfunction should be conducted with an objective measure like the SCIP.

AB - Introduction Cognitive impairment is common in bipolar disorder and contributes to socio-occupational difficulties. The objective was to validate and evaluate instruments to screen for and monitor cognitive impairments, and improve the understanding of the association between cognitive measures and socio-occupational capacity. Methods Patients with bipolar disorder in partial or full remission (n=84) and healthy controls (n=68) were assessed with the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP), Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Scale (COBRA), and established neuropsychological tests and subjective rating scales. Socio-occupational function and affective symptoms were evaluated with the Functional Assessment Short Test, and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-items and Young Mania Rating Scale, respectively. Concurrent validity of the SCIP and COBRA were assessed by correlation with established objective and subjective cognitive measures, and decision validity was determined with Receiver-Operating-Characteristic analyses. Correlations and linear regression analyses were conducted to determine the associations between objective and subjective cognitive impairment, and socio-occupational difficulties. Results The SCIP and COBRA correlated strongly with established objective and subjective cognitive measures, respectively. The SCIP yielded higher sensitivity and specificity for detection of cognitive dysfunction than the COBRA or a combined SCIP-COBRA measure. Correlations between objective and subjective cognitive impairment were weak but both were associated with socio-occupational difficulties. Limitations Influence of ageing was not investigated. Conclusions The SCIP and COBRA are valid for detection of objective and subjective cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder. Screening for cognitive dysfunction should be conducted with an objective measure like the SCIP.

KW - Bipolar disorder

KW - Cognitive complaints

KW - Cognitive impairment

KW - Screening

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.039

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.039

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26301477

VL - 187

SP - 10

EP - 19

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

SN - 0165-0327

ER -

ID: 161583679