A Response to 'Attribution Science and the Fate of Climate Change Litigation' - Benoit Mayer
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Communication
Documents
- Global Policy - 2023 - Otto - Law justice and the role of courts in changing the social superstructure narrative in
Final published version, 112 KB, PDF document
In the article Causality and the fate of climate litigation: The role of the social superstructure narrative, we argue that an enhanced and wider understanding of attribution science will shape the social superstructure narrative of climate change. This social superstructure narrative influences courts in their decision-making. Benoit Mayer, in the same issue, has commented on our article. We use this rejoinder to clarify three elements of Mayer's comments in his response to help avoid any misconception of our argument or misunderstanding of the German Civil Code and thus hopefully enrich the discussion. These clarifications speak to the role of the courts first to preserve the rule of law and second in the context of climate change with the third clarification relating to the legal basis of a specific claim under German law.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Global Policy |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 2 |
Pages (from-to) | 416-416 |
Number of pages | 4 |
ISSN | 1758-5880 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk
No data available
ID: 335691924