Suppression of a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in the Italian municipality of Vo’

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 5.47 MB, PDF document

  • Enrico Lavezzo
  • Elisa Franchin
  • Constanze Ciavarella
  • Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg
  • Luisa Barzon
  • Claudia Del Vecchio
  • Lucia Rossi
  • Riccardo Manganelli
  • Arianna Loregian
  • Nicolò Navarin
  • Davide Abate
  • Manuela Sciro
  • Stefano Merigliano
  • Ettore De Canale
  • Maria Cristina Vanuzzo
  • Valeria Besutti
  • Francesca Saluzzo
  • Francesco Onelia
  • Monia Pacenti
  • Saverio G. Parisi
  • Giovanni Carretta
  • Daniele Donato
  • Luciano Flor
  • Silvia Cocchio
  • Giulia Masi
  • Alessandro Sperduti
  • Lorenzo Cattarino
  • Renato Salvador
  • Michele Nicoletti
  • Federico Caldart
  • Gioele Castelli
  • Eleonora Nieddu
  • Beatrice Labella
  • Ludovico Fava
  • Matteo Drigo
  • Katy A.M. Gaythorpe
  • Kylie E.C. Ainslie
  • Marc Baguelin
  • Bhatt, Samir
  • Adhiratha Boonyasiri
  • Olivia Boyd
  • Lorenzo Cattarino
  • Constanze Ciavarella
  • Coupland, Helen Louise
  • Zulma Cucunubá
  • Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg
  • Bimandra A. Djafaara
  • Christl A. Donnelly
  • Ilaria Dorigatti
  • Swapnil Mishra
  • Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team

On 21 February 2020, a resident of the municipality of Vo’, a small town near Padua (Italy), died of pneumonia due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection1. This was the first coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19)-related death detected in Italy since the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Chinese city of Wuhan, Hubei province2. In response, the regional authorities imposed the lockdown of the whole municipality for 14 days3. Here we collected information on the demography, clinical presentation, hospitalization, contact network and the presence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in nasopharyngeal swabs for 85.9% and 71.5% of the population of Vo’ at two consecutive time points. From the first survey, which was conducted around the time the town lockdown started, we found a prevalence of infection of 2.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.1–3.3%). From the second survey, which was conducted at the end of the lockdown, we found a prevalence of 1.2% (95% CI: 0.8–1.8%). Notably, 42.5% (95% CI: 31.5–54.6%) of the confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections detected across the two surveys were asymptomatic (that is, did not have symptoms at the time of swab testing and did not develop symptoms afterwards). The mean serial interval was 7.2 days (95% CI: 5.9–9.6). We found no statistically significant difference in the viral load of symptomatic versus asymptomatic infections (P = 0.62 and 0.74 for E and RdRp genes, respectively, exact Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test). This study sheds light on the frequency of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, their infectivity (as measured by the viral load) and provides insights into its transmission dynamics and the efficacy of the implemented control measures.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNature
Volume584
Issue number7821
Pages (from-to)425-429
Number of pages5
ISSN0028-0836
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

ID: 291804138