Mental health trajectories after juridical divorce: Does personality matter?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Mental health trajectories after juridical divorce : Does personality matter? / Hald, Gert Martin; Wimmelmann, Cathrine Lawaetz; Overup, Camilla S.; Cipric, Ana; Sander, Soren; Strizzi, Jenna Marie.
In: Journal of Personality, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2023, p. 426-440.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Mental health trajectories after juridical divorce
T2 - Does personality matter?
AU - Hald, Gert Martin
AU - Wimmelmann, Cathrine Lawaetz
AU - Overup, Camilla S.
AU - Cipric, Ana
AU - Sander, Soren
AU - Strizzi, Jenna Marie
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction This study investigated whether the Big Five personality dimensions were associated with mental health trajectories and/or intervention effects of a digital divorce intervention from juridical divorce to 12 months following juridical divorce. The study utilized a randomized controlled trial study design (N = 676) and measured mental health outcomes (anxiety, depression, somatization, and stress) at study inclusion (i.e., at juridical divorce) and 3-, 6-, and 12 months after juridical divorce. Big Five personality dimensions were measured 1 month post study inclusion. Results The study found that neuroticism is the personality dimension most predictive of post-divorce mental health outcomes. Specifically, divorcees with higher neuroticism scores indicated worse mental health immediately following divorce, but their symptom levels decreased more rapidly over a 12 months period after juridical divorce compared with lower neuroticism divorcees. It is also notable that their mean scores for the mental health outcomes remained higher at all time points (3, 6, and 12 months post baseline), relative to those lower in neuroticism. Conclusion Findings are discussed in light of divorce-adjustment-theory and the stress-buffering model.
AB - Introduction This study investigated whether the Big Five personality dimensions were associated with mental health trajectories and/or intervention effects of a digital divorce intervention from juridical divorce to 12 months following juridical divorce. The study utilized a randomized controlled trial study design (N = 676) and measured mental health outcomes (anxiety, depression, somatization, and stress) at study inclusion (i.e., at juridical divorce) and 3-, 6-, and 12 months after juridical divorce. Big Five personality dimensions were measured 1 month post study inclusion. Results The study found that neuroticism is the personality dimension most predictive of post-divorce mental health outcomes. Specifically, divorcees with higher neuroticism scores indicated worse mental health immediately following divorce, but their symptom levels decreased more rapidly over a 12 months period after juridical divorce compared with lower neuroticism divorcees. It is also notable that their mean scores for the mental health outcomes remained higher at all time points (3, 6, and 12 months post baseline), relative to those lower in neuroticism. Conclusion Findings are discussed in light of divorce-adjustment-theory and the stress-buffering model.
KW - anxiety
KW - big five personality
KW - depression
KW - divorce
KW - somatization
KW - stress
KW - MAJOR LIFE EVENTS
KW - MODERATE REACTION
KW - DEPRESSION
KW - TRAITS
KW - ADAPTATION
KW - STRESS
KW - STABILITY
KW - MODELS
KW - SATISFACTION
KW - INDIVIDUALS
U2 - 10.1111/jopy.12737
DO - 10.1111/jopy.12737
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35656740
VL - 91
SP - 426
EP - 440
JO - Journal of Personality
JF - Journal of Personality
SN - 0022-3506
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 312188941